Thursday, August 7, 2014

Community Calls Upon Minister To Establish Planning Commission Now




The Hon Gladys Berejiklian MP
Minister for the Hunter and Transport
1 Farrer Place
Thursday, 22 May 2014

Dear Minister,

Request for the Hon Pru Goward MP to establish Planning Commission of inquiry to hear
objections to the current Newcastle revitalisation proposals and alternatives


Parks and Playgrounds Movement is opposed to the illogical termination of the rail connection to historic Newcastle. Trams are a separate issue and a tram network could be established for Newcastle and suburbs quite separately to the current rail debacle. The existing rail corridor from Newcastle Station to Hamilton Station is principally a question of Tram/Train rolling stock to be used between Hamilton and Newcastle or existing rail services with the re-establishment of the over bridges and level crossings removed in recent years.

We ask the Minister for Planning the Hon Pru Goward MP to establish a Planning Commission of inquiry to hear objections to the revitalisation proposals and alternatives in a fair open and transparent way.

The announcement by Planning Minister Brad Hazzard in March 2013 that the rail would be cut to Newcastle and a new Terminal Station and Interchange built at Wickham is the sort of arbitrary announcement that is not acceptable as a base for the Newcastle Renewal Strategy. We insisted at that time that an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared and exhibited setting out the social and environmental impacts and alternatives to justify this extraordinary announcement. Because of the lack of official consultation it is essential that a Commissioner be appointed to hear objections to the Revitalisation Proposals. This is made even more important because of the extent of the current ICAC corruption inquiry.

The Movement has watched proposals for removal of rail connection to the city as since 1952. Such proposal may have had some sense in 1952 when private transport was beginning to supplant public transport but today they are misguided and based on a false understanding of the morphology of Newcastle and future trends in public transport. The Development Application for GPT is another outrage and blight on the planning history of the heritage city of Newcastle. GPT has had a negative influence and the current proposals are unacceptable.

Ironically the rot began when the Newcastle City Council adopted a special rate in 1988 over properties within the Newcastle Business District to fund the activities of the Newcastle CityCentre Committee (registered 1996 deregistered 2008). In 2000 the Newcastle Alliance Inc was set up by Newcastle Council to implement the Council’s Merchandising Plan. The Newcastle Business Improvement Association Inc. registered in 2011 is now Council’s recipient of the rate funds. These bodies have been Council Committees spending rate funds in excess of $10million dollars. An enquiry should be held into the amount of funds collected and how the funds have been disbursed. The Movement was particularly concerned when the Alliance, became involved in political advertising for the last state election.



We believe that the property lobby through the Hunter Development Corporation and Newcastle Alliance have pursued revitalisation without transparency and public scrutiny. The HDC’s life as a renewal body began in 1993 with the endorsement of the Honeysuckle ‘Approved Scheme’ by Minister Mr Robert Webster 15/3/93.



This Scheme prepared under Section 14 of the Growth Centres Act and ordered for implementation under Section 17 of the Act is an embarrassment in that it was never exhibited publicly and revised. The HDC has now been given reign over the whole Hunter region. Truly the HDC has done good work in the renewal of the former railway yards, Carrington and the Marina Precincts but has failed to implement their key objectives in the Honeysuckle Central Area. HDC encouraged existing development from the traditional CBD. (Notable examples include Hunter Water, the NSW Planning Department and Newcastle Museum) This has been the opposite of Urban Renewal and the Parks and Playgrounds Movement believes the HDC should now be disbanded.

Passenger rail services to Newcastle’s historic Station are germane to Newcastle Urban Renewal growth. The existing passenger rail stations are located in strategic positions within the identified renewal area and are the critical focus areas that should feature in any effective renewal strategy. Improved access to Wickham and Civic Stations as recommended by the Director General of Planning are 15 years overdue and should be implemented immediately.

1. Coal River Heritage Corridor: (Nobbys (Whibayganba) Aboriginal Dreaming site, Birth site of
Newcastle,1801 coalmining settlement, Lumber Yard, Macquarie Pier Port Development, Military
Works and Fort Scratchley)

2. Pacific Park Heritage Corridor: ( Convict Hospital and Convict Gaol sites and Customs House

3. Government House Heritage Corridor: (Earliest wharf and Government Administration Governor’s
House, Borough Council Chambers and King Edward Park)

4. Courthouse Heritage Corridor: (Newcastle Post Office, Historic Courthouse, Military Barracks )

5. Cathedral Heritage Corridor: Christchurch Cathedral 1828 focus of Town Axis, Cathedral
Cemetery, Borough Market and produce wharf (Queens Wharf)

6. Civic Heritage Corridor: (City Council and City Hall, Honeysuckle railway works. Civic Park and
Cultural Precinct).

7. Transport Heritage Corridor: (Great Northern Railway 1857, Newcastle Railway Station and Civic
Station, rail heritage)


Revitalisation has been progressing since 1988 but the integrity of the city renewal has been held-up by the straightjacket of the Honeysuckle Development Corporation and vested property interests for twenty years because they have been wrongly targeting the removal of railway services and destruction of the unique heritage values of the city of Newcastle.

We believe that the previous Minister for Planning acted recklessly in 2013 in announcing a termination of passenger rail services to historic Newcastle Station. He disregarded the rights of the disabled, the young and the elderly, indeed all railway users and the people of the region. The Planning Minister in 1998 should have directed the HDC to vary their approved scheme in accordance with the provisions of the Growth Centres (development corporations) Act to include the city’s heritage rail spine and comply with his Regional Environmental Plan Honeysuckle Amendment 3 shown below.


Under today’s circumstances the two new replacement Level Crossings should be completed at Steel Street and Worth Place. (The roads each side of the railway have been in place for many years) and the three pedestrian over-bridges should be replaced at convenient locations between Wickham and Newcastle. The only other logical way to modify the rail is to introduce a number of Tram/Train carriages to run continuously between an improved terminal station at Hamilton and a revitalised Newcastle Station with a proposed Arrival/Departure concourse featuring views to heritage building and providing , travel facilities and food outlets. This could allow for as many road or pedestrian crossings as required in the future.


The Newcastle Railway Station is a heritage place having the distinction of being a unique terminal station of the Great Northern Railway which is the second passenger rail system in NSW (Newcastle to Maitland-1857). The existing station is beautifully situated in the heart of historic Newcastle close to the harbour Foreshore and the Newcastle Beaches. It is listed on the NSW State Heritage Register and is surrounded by other State Heritage Items including the Coal River Precinct, Nobbys Headland and Fort Scratchley and the Convict Lumber Yard. The wonderful Customs House with its distinctive clock tower and Time Ball and the Great Northern Hotel are heritage listed sites adjacent to the station. Many elderly and disabled people as well as commuters from the Central Coast and from the Hunter Valley including Maitland travel to Newcastle rail station to access this unique destination and appreciate its excellent accessible platforms with their easy access to the harbour and Stockton Ferry wharf and bus terminal.


Newcastle Railway Station is a heritage place of distinction with many State Heritage listed Items
The Movement proposed that an Arrival/Departure Concourse be established as an activity hub at the rail terminal.

The mistakes of HDC, for example, in buying the longshore wharfs and removing them. The building-out of the planned Flinders Cove project which was a feature of the 1993 Civic Design proposal was a mistake as was the destruction of the view corridor from Merewether Street to the harbour with the ugly Crown Plaza Hotel development. It is essential that an independent Planning Inquiry be held to advise the Minister for planning so that the people of the Hunter region can be guaranteed a fair undistorted input to the decision making process.

Clearly there is much to be done to reappraise the Renewal Strategy in a fair and transparent way and retain convenient rail access and the heritage values of the historic Newcastle.

Yours faithfully,

Doug Lithgow
President Parks and Playgrounds Movement Inc


Tuesday, October 29, 2013

ACT NOW - Crown Lands Amendment (Multiple Land Use) Bill 2013



DANGER -  ALIENATION OF CROWN LAND RESERVES - ACT TODAY

Please write or phone Upper House Members of Parliament:


The Premier of NSW (premier@nsw.gov.au)
The Hon Tim Owen    newcastle@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Leader of the Opposition LOP@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Shadow Minister  Luke.Foley@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Hon. Robert Brown robert.brown@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Hon. Robert Borsak  robert.borsak@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Hon Fred Nile F.Nile@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Hon Paul Green paul.green@parliament.nsw.gov.au
The Hon. Jeremy Buckingham jeremy.buckingham@parliament.nsw.gov.au


WHAT IS THE ISSUE? 

Crown Lands Amendment (Multiple Land Use) Bill 2013 is now before the NSW Legislative Council (Upper House).

This Legislation will give the Minister and his delegate controlling Crown Lands the power to alienate the lands with extra uses without notification. The meagre safeguard of public notification and management principles in the current Act will be bypassed.

The changes further weaken the current Crown Lands Act and deny the public protection of Public Reserves and should be rejected. It will only clear the way for clandestine corruption.

PLEASE REJECT THIS BILL


FURTHER BACKGROUND  - ALIENATION OF CROWN LAND

There is currently before the NSW parliament a bill to amend the Crown Lands Act. It has passed the Lower House and will be debated in the Upper House on Tuesday or Wednesday.

The amendment allows the Minister to override the dedication of the land and grant a lease without the present constraints of the Act.

Presently, the Minister has the power to grant a lease for purposes that are contrary to the dedication of the land but the lease has to be gazetted and subjected to parliamentary scrutiny.

These checks and balances will be removed if this bill is passed.

Crown Land will no longer be protected.

It will allow the effective sell-off and commercialisation of some of the most important and prominent pieces of real estate in NSW.

It is done under the guise of protecting the validity of existing leases. This is a nonsense!!
Scout halls, kiosks, surf clubs are valid community uses of public land and are hardly likely to be challenged. This is a grab by the state government for precious public land that is supported by many cash strapped Councils who can see a cheap and easy option to make money out of crown land.

Friends of King Edward Park Inc. have been fighting for 2 years in the courts to protect publicly dedicated land in NSW against development that is contrary to its dedication and to preserve the Headland Reserve. This has been acknowledged in the Land and Environment Court as a test case with merit. The introduction of the amendment neatly absolves the Minister of his liabilities.

Don’t let this bill pass through parliament. Put your objection in an email today. Preserve our precious public spaces for future generations. Use the points above if you can for your email or forward the attached form letter.

Doug Lithgow
President of the Parks and Playgrounds Movement
A Freeman of the City of Newcastle

Thursday, February 21, 2013



The Newcastle Heritage Railway Station must remain a unique railway destination in the Newcastle urban renewal strategy 2012. 

The O'Farrell Government has acted recklessly in announcing a termination of passenger rail services to historic Newcastle Station at the same time as announcing a new transport interchange will be built at Wickham, a suburb of Newcastle, with buses replacing trains.

No Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this proposal.

The rights of the disabled, the young and the elderly, indeed all railway users have been discriminated against without the slightest consideration in this reckless announcement.

Concerning cross rail connectivity: in recent years HDC has overseen the removed 3 pedestrian over-bridges and 2 vehicular level crossings. (Over-bridges at Bolton St, Worth Pl. and Cooper St. & Level crossings at Hannell St. & Market St.)

Two new replacement Level Crossings should be completed at Steel Street and Worth Place. (the roads each side of the railway have been in place for many years). The 3 pedestrian over-bridges could be replaced at convenient locations between Wickham and Newcastle.

Newcastle Rail Station Heritage importance & accessibility : 

The Newcastle Railway Station is a heritage place having the distinction of being a unique terminal station of the second passenger rail system in NSW (The Great Northern Railway: 1857 - Newcastle to Maitland) the station is situated in the heart of historic Newcastle close to the harbour Foreshore and the Newcastle Beaches. It is listed on the NSW State Heritage Register and is surrounded by other State Heritage Items: the Coal River Precinct including Nobbys Headland and Fort Scratchley and the Convict Lumber Yard. The wonderful Customs House with its distinctive clock tower and Time Ball and the Great Northern Hotel are heritage listed sites adjacent to the station. Many elderly and disabled people as well as commuters from the Central Coast and from the Hunter Valley including Maitland travel to Newcastle rail station  to access this unique destination and appreciate its excellent accessible platforms with their easy access to the harbour and Stockton Ferry and existing bus interchange.


The announcement must be set aside and the passenger rail services be made a feature of the Renewal Strategy with improved pedestrian access to Wickham and Civic Stations and the replacement of the connectivity removed in the past two decades.

The legal machinery to correct this situation must be invoked by directing the Hunter Development Corporation to review its "Approved Scheme" which is totally inappropriate for its widened responsibility over the whole Hunter Region.

The Hunter Region deserves better, Premier O'Farrell.


Doug Lithgow

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

SUBMISSION ON LAMAN STREET DESIGN

Laman Street - February 2012


Please find below the Parks and Playgrounds Movement Letter to the General Manager of the City of Newcastle and Submission on the Laman Street Re-Design.

We are appalled at the systemic dishonesty in the Newcastle Council. It is affecting all the public domain matters that Council touches e.g. the coastal alienation of parkland.

There has been an inability of the elected Councillors to understand the statutory importance of Plans of Management for Community Land and their inability to implement the Urban Forest Policy and the Asset Management Policy in the public interest.

This was highlighted in stark relief by the distortion in the Risk assessment at Laman Street and Council’s intransigence in refusing to professionally review what was obviously wrong.

The misuse of the Roads Act that flowed from that intransigence even to the extent of misleading the Land and Environment Court by nor revealing the proposed developments that were driving their immediate reason for removing the trees.

The final straw was Council requesting police support to back up their poor governance.

Let us hope that the Newcastle Councillors after the next election are more public spirited.

Cheers
Doug


General Manager
Newcastle City Council
PO Box 489  NEWCASTLE 2300                                             

Friday, 25 May 2012

Dear Mr Pearce,

Please find the attached pdf submission to the redevelopment of Laman Street from the Parks and Playgrounds Movement.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21528529/PPM/2012-May-PPMLamanSub.pdf

A pdf copy of the Movement’s earlier request for Council to resolve its framework proposals and place them on exhibition is attached.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21528529/PPM/2010-09-13-Request.pdf

Council acted wrongly in not clearly resolving its proposal in August /September 2010 and in withholding its proposal sent to the Anzac Centenary Commission in Canberra from the Land and Environment Court in the action Parks and playgrounds Movement Vs Newcastle City Council matter.

Please note.

Yours sincerely,

Doug Lithgow
Parks and Playgrounds Movement

Monday, March 12, 2012

Where is our fine City Square?

Where is our fine City Square?

Since 1952 the Parks and Playgrounds Movement have watched and supported the establishment of Civic Park. The enlarged park was proposed as a feature of the 1952 County planning scheme and the guiding vision was for a fine Civic Square as a gracious setting for important public buildings.

Our Councillors have again fumbled the task and new start is needed. To implement that vision requires an even handed Council with a clear process and meaningful public participation.

Overstating the fig risk to escape public input and trigger the Roads Act was a mistake that created dissension and has ultimately left Laman Street naked and without shade, shelter or beauty.

That mistake could not corrected by belligerence or a contingent of police. What was needed was an independent expert to check Council’s calculations and assumptions and for council to get on with preparing and adopting an official landscape plan.

We as a city are now left the poorer and our fine City Square and Cultural Precinct is still just a vision.

Doug Lithgow